social studies
haiz... i seriously think that it's not good to be born in the year of dragon...
ss was a disaster... at least to me... all my other friends did well... but i somehow feels that my answers are just all rubbish... maybe the examiners can just throw it into the bin... haiz... all my answers are crap~ obviously the factors(benefits) are not interlinked... but i just squeezed myself an answer to try to show that they are interlinked... haiz... it can get so wrong... i'm so dumb... so useless...
others don't have the same reaction... but when i first opened the paper... 'Falkland? what is this... did i totally missed out something for the two years or did i get the wrong paper?' haiz... so stupid... how can i be so stupid to think of such things... teachers said b4 that we can get something we totally did not study liao de mah... anyway source-based questions are meant to test our skills.... but i don't have the skills? the questions are phrased until i don't even know what skills they are testing... first question inference k i noe... second i forget... but third asking us motive? we have to straight away talk about the motive rite? but i onli have one motive? to gain support from the parliament? omg... haiz... it's 5 or 6 marks i think... i don't really have the time to look at the marks... haiz... structured-essay was another disaster... kkz... shall not repeat... it's all rubbish... i crap to make it seems as though the benefits are all somehow interlinked... haiz... gonna fail it...
kkz... look at my english... tml is my english paper and my standard is still like this... how am i going to do well for it? i should be happy enough to be able to pass it... haiz... after seeing so many 'surprises', i totally believe that any kinda format is possible for tml paper1... just don't let it be brochure or leaflet... i never did any practice on that before...
one down... how many more to go? i don't dare to count :X
i'm conquered...
ss was a disaster... at least to me... all my other friends did well... but i somehow feels that my answers are just all rubbish... maybe the examiners can just throw it into the bin... haiz... all my answers are crap~ obviously the factors(benefits) are not interlinked... but i just squeezed myself an answer to try to show that they are interlinked... haiz... it can get so wrong... i'm so dumb... so useless...
others don't have the same reaction... but when i first opened the paper... 'Falkland? what is this... did i totally missed out something for the two years or did i get the wrong paper?' haiz... so stupid... how can i be so stupid to think of such things... teachers said b4 that we can get something we totally did not study liao de mah... anyway source-based questions are meant to test our skills.... but i don't have the skills? the questions are phrased until i don't even know what skills they are testing... first question inference k i noe... second i forget... but third asking us motive? we have to straight away talk about the motive rite? but i onli have one motive? to gain support from the parliament? omg... haiz... it's 5 or 6 marks i think... i don't really have the time to look at the marks... haiz... structured-essay was another disaster... kkz... shall not repeat... it's all rubbish... i crap to make it seems as though the benefits are all somehow interlinked... haiz... gonna fail it...
kkz... look at my english... tml is my english paper and my standard is still like this... how am i going to do well for it? i should be happy enough to be able to pass it... haiz... after seeing so many 'surprises', i totally believe that any kinda format is possible for tml paper1... just don't let it be brochure or leaflet... i never did any practice on that before...
one down... how many more to go? i don't dare to count :X
i'm conquered...
